Daniel Andrews, Georgina Stephens & Tim Fawns unpack the argument that securing assessment in the genAI era is a waste of time; and in doing so lead us to reconsider what really matters when we assess students.

Donna Lu invites us to consider the implications of AI in assessment and the opportunity we have to create something better. Can you pull off a half-pike twist with your assessment design, or will you end up with a belly flop?

Juliana Peloche, Mike Perkins & Jasper Roe consider what utopian and dystopian perspectives reveal about assessment and feedback in the era of generative AI.

Diana Saragi Turnip shares insights from the inaugural Australasian Symposium on Programmatic Approaches to Assessment, including key threads that tied together the day.

Therese O'Sullivan shares her experiences in how online assessment can be done in the age of artificial intelligence with the example of a digital decision index assessment.

Benito Cao explores whether the essay is dead or alive in a time where Generative AI is at the finger tips of students.

Using the example of a podcast assessment task, Daniel Andrews explores the value of authenticity and autonomy in assessment.

Katie Burke, David Roy, Sian Chapman, William Baker, Amy Hamilton, & Katie Hotko encourage us to consider a praxis-based assessment approach to create space for reflection and to humanise the learning process.

James Tsatsaronis explores assessing the process and the product where students solve complex problems in small groups, as a means of ensuring assessments maintain security and validity.

Bhawana Bhatta Kaudal explores strategies educators can use to alleviate assessment related stress to help students reach their full potential!